Placeholder

MATH 125 Logic and Decision Making

$5.00

Quantity:

Product Description

MATH 125 Logic and Decision Making

Assignment Overview

Type:

Individual Project

Unit:

Logic and Decision Making

Due Date: Grading Type:

Numeric

Points Possible:

100

Points Earned:

0

Deliverable Length:

3-5 pages

View objectives for this assignment Go To:

  • Assignment Details
  • Learning Materials
  • Reading Assignment

My Work:

Online Deliverables:

  • Submissions

Assignment Details  Assignment Description

For assistance with your assignment, please use your text, Web resources, and all course materials.

Project Criteria Exceeds
90% – 100%
Very good
80% – 89%
Meets
70%–79%
Needs Improvement Below 70%
Content
75%
Response covers all topics indicated in the assignment and adds additional content. Response covers most topics indicated in the assignment. Response covers many of the topics indicated in the assignment. Response covers none to some of the topics indicated in the assignment.
Effective Communication
10%
Demonstrates outstanding or exemplary application of written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates outstanding expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Audience is addressed appropriately. Language clearly and effectively communicates ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are minimal. Organization is clear. Format is consistently appropriate to assignment. Presentation and delivery are confident and persuasive (where applicable). The writing was of collegiate level with no errors in spelling or grammar. Demonstrates very good written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates sound expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Audience is usually addressed appropriately. Language does not interfere with the communication of ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are present, but do not distract from the message. Organization is apparent and mostly clear. Format is appropriate to assignment, but not entirely consistent. The writing was of collegiate level with two or less errors in spelling or grammar. Demonstrates acceptable written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates reasonable expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Sometimes, audience is addressed appropriately. Language does not interfere with the communication of ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are present and may distract from the message. Organization is a bit unclear. Format is inconsistent. The writing was of collegiate level with several errors in spelling or grammar. Demonstrates inadequate or partially proficient application of written, visual, or oral skills. Demonstrates inadequate or partial expression of topic, main idea, and purpose. Audience is often not addressed appropriately. Language often impedes the communication of ideas and content relevant to the assignment. Errors in grammar, spelling, and sentence structure are frequent and often distract from meaning or presentation. Organization is inadequate, confusing, and distracting. Format is inadequate and obscures meaning. The writing was less than collegiate level with numerous errors in spelling or grammar
Supporting Analysis
15%
Analysis exceeds minimum requirements. Sources are used to support analysis, are appropriate, and are properly referenced Basic analysis provided to support assertions. Sources are cited, appropriate, and properly referenced Limited analysis provided to support assertions. Some sources are cited, appropriate, and properly referenced No or inaccurate analysis, no sources are cited when needed, analysis and/or sources are not appropriate. When sources used, are not properly referenced